Topic:

Kas kolmanda raske vägivallakuriteo tulemuseks peaks olema eluaegne vangistus ilma tingimisi vabastamiseta?

Kas kolmanda raske vägivallakuriteo tulemuseks peaks olema eluaegne vangistus ilma tingimisi vabastamiseta?
Tehisintellekti loodud illustratsioon

VoteWorldi kogukond

  • Jah 100% (1)
  • Ei 0% (0)

VoteWorldi kogukond: 1

Ametlik tulemus — USA

  • Jah 75.7% (1135521)
  • Ei 24.3% (364567)

Ametlik tulemus — USA: 1500088

VoteWorld votes shown. An official imported result is available separately. Official source: https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Initiative_593,_Life_Sentencing_for_Three_Serious_Offense_Convictions_Measure_(1993). Imported: 2026-08-16.

Lisateave

Washington, 1993
Washington voters were asked whether repeat serious offenders should receive life imprisonment without possibility of parole after their third qualifying serious offence. Supporters argued that people repeatedly committing serious violent crimes should be permanently removed from society. Opponents argued that mandatory life sentences remove judicial discretion and could produce disproportionately harsh punishment in some cases. The proposal was approved by voters.