Home
Topic:

Should a third serious violent crime result in life imprisonment without parole?

Should a third serious violent crime result in life imprisonment without parole?
人工智能生成嘅插圖

VoteWorld 社群

  • 100% (1)
  • 唔係 0% (0)

VoteWorld 社群: 1

官方結果 — USA

  • 75.7% (1135521)
  • 唔係 24.3% (364567)

官方結果 — USA: 1500088

VoteWorld votes shown. An official imported result is available separately. Official source: https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Initiative_593,_Life_Sentencing_for_Three_Serious_Offense_Convictions_Measure_(1993). Imported: 2026-08-16.

更多資訊

Washington, 1993
Washington voters were asked whether repeat serious offenders should receive life imprisonment without possibility of parole after their third qualifying serious offence. Supporters argued that people repeatedly committing serious violent crimes should be permanently removed from society. Opponents argued that mandatory life sentences remove judicial discretion and could produce disproportionately harsh punishment in some cases. The proposal was approved by voters.